The Supreme Court of Pakistan has delivered a historic verdict by restoring the judicial powers of Justice Jahangiri, reversing the earlier suspension imposed by the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in the fake degree case. This ruling is being celebrated as a significant step forward in strengthening judicial independence and accountability across Pakistan.
Supreme Court’s Verdict
The Court ruled that the IHC’s move to strip Justice Jahangiri of his powers was unconstitutional and unjustified, undermining the principles of judicial freedom. By reinstating him, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its role as the guardian of justice, ensuring that no authority can unfairly compromise the independence of the judiciary.
Why This Matters
This decision is more than just about one judge—it is a precedent-setting judgment that reinforces the importance of fairness, due process, and the separation of powers. Legal analysts argue that it strengthens trust in the judicial system, sending a clear message that personal or political motives cannot override the Constitution.
Public & Legal Reactions
Civil society groups, bar councils, and citizens have welcomed the verdict, calling it a turning point in Pakistan’s legal history. Many believe this case will become a reference point for future challenges to judicial authority.
Strengthening Democratic Institutions
Judicial independence is the backbone of democracy. By restoring Justice Jahangiri’s powers, the Supreme Court has reinforced the idea that no judge should be punished or sidelined without lawful justification. This verdict upholds transparency, judicial accountability, and the supremacy of law, which are vital for Pakistan’s democratic growth.
Trusted Sources for More Details
For authentic news and in-depth analysis on this landmark case, visit:
Conclusion
The restoration of Justice Jahangiri’s powers is a landmark victory for judicial freedom in Pakistan. It sets a powerful precedent, ensuring that justice remains free from undue influence and political interference. The Supreme Court’s verdict stands as a reminder that the judiciary must always function independently to protect democracy and the rule of law.
